MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7032962071

Option pricing with tree model in view of hedging

2010· other· en· W7032962071 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBorder Security and International Relations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrinomial treeTrinomialBinomial options pricing modelValuation of optionsCall optionFinite difference methods for option pricingMonte Carlo methods for option pricingTree (set theory)Stochastic game
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Black Scholes model is a simple and popular way to model asset price process and explicit formulae of many options have already been found.They can give us better understanding and further insight about the characteristic of the options.However, there are still many derivatives for which the explicit solutions are unknown or the explicit solutions themselves require numerical methods to approximate their values.Different numerical methods are introduced to find the price of options directly, one is the tree model.Under no arbitrage assumption, pricing is equivalent to hedging.Here, we would first focus on the trinomial tree model and look at the pricing problem in view of hedging.A square payoff derivative is introduced so as to provide another view of option pricing in trinomial tree model.Further analysis on tree models would also be given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it