MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033116347

Probing the pairing symmetry and pair charge stiffness of doped $t-J$\n ladders

2017· article· en· W7033116347 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnvironmental Science and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryDivision of Materials ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBosonizationPairingCooper pairParity (physics)Charge (physics)SuperconductivityRenormalization groupSymmetry (geometry)Phase (matter)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We perform the numerical equivalent of a phase sensitive experiment on doped\n$t-J$ ladders. We apply proximity effect fields with different complex phases\nat both ends of an open system and we study the transport of Cooper pairs.\nMeasuring the response of the system and the induced Josephson current, Density\nMatrix Renormalization Group calculations show how, depending on the doping\nfraction, the rung-leg parity of the pair field changes from minus to plus as\nthe density of holes is increased. We also study the pair charge stiffness, and\nwe observe a supression of the superconductivity in the region where static\nstripes appear. We compare our results with predictions from bosonization and\nrenormalization group analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it