Physichal caharacteristics of Iberian lynxes (lynx pardinus) from Donana, Southwestern Spain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
External and cranial measurements were determined for live-trapped lberian lnxes and lynx skulls from Doñana National Park, Spain, and its surroundings. Skins of Iberian lynxes from the same population collected between 1895 and 1986 were examined to de termine pelage-pattern characteristics. Adult (n” 2 years old) males were larger and heavier (273%) than adult females. Age-classes were statistically different for most skull measure ments. Considerable variation was found between juveniles (05-1 year old) and subadults (1-2 years old). In 10 of the 19 skull measurements, adult males were significantl) larger than adult females, including length of ml, mandibular fossa—length of P4, height of mandible, length of skull, and condylobasal length. Iberian lynxes were similar ifl size to the Nearctic bobcat (L. rufus) and the Canadian lynx (L canadensis). Three main pelage patterns were present in the Doñana population until 1960. Genetic variation of this pop ulation may have decreased during the past 3 decades as exemplified by the loss of the two rarest pelage patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".