MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033128336

Physichal caharacteristics of Iberian lynxes (lynx pardinus) from Donana, Southwestern Spain

2011· other· en· W7033128336 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkullPopulationNearctic ecozoneVariation (astronomy)CraniaAdult male
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

External and cranial measurements were determined for live-trapped lberian lnxes and lynx skulls from Doñana National Park, Spain, and its surroundings. Skins of Iberian lynxes from the same population collected between 1895 and 1986 were examined to de­ termine pelage-pattern characteristics. Adult (n” 2 years old) males were larger and heavier (273%) than adult females. Age-classes were statistically different for most skull measure­ ments. Considerable variation was found between juveniles (05-1 year old) and subadults (1-2 years old). In 10 of the 19 skull measurements, adult males were significantl) larger than adult females, including length of ml, mandibular fossa—length of P4, height of mandible, length of skull, and condylobasal length. Iberian lynxes were similar ifl size to the Nearctic bobcat (L. rufus) and the Canadian lynx (L canadensis). Three main pelage patterns were present in the Doñana population until 1960. Genetic variation of this pop­ ulation may have decreased during the past 3 decades as exemplified by the loss of the two rarest pelage patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))Same topicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementFrench-language works237,207