MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033169161

Plan de negocio para la creación de una empresa de producción y distribución de comida regional para oficinistas en San Isidro y Miraflores

2018· dissertation· es· W7033169161 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicEngineering and Information Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Work (physics)Nova scotia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Regional” es un negocio de producción y distribución de comida peruana regional que atiende la demanda de comida elaborada a la hora de almuerzo y que va dirigido a oficinistas de los distritos de San Isidro y Miraflores. La propuesta se centra en la variedad de carta, calidad e inocuidad, sabores representativos de las tres regiones del país y un delivery rápido y puntual. Para posicionar la marca en la mente del público objetivo se utiliza las redes sociales con publicidad dirigida. La oferta del producto es a través de una página web y un aplicativo móvil, que permiten registrar los pedidos y programar la hora de entrega en el rango de 12 a 13:30 horas con ventana de 30 minutos. Los pagos pueden ser realizados en efectivo o con tarjeta, ya sea online o contra entrega con total seguridad. Como parte del servicio de post venta, se realiza monitoreo constante de las quejas, reclamos y malestares que puedan presentarse con el funcionamiento normal del aplicativo móvil y la calidad del servicio. Ante cualquier inconveniente comprobado se brinda algún beneficio al cliente para resarcir la mala experiencia y fidelizarlo. La información recabada del suceso se utiliza para mejorar los procesos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicEngineering and Information TechnologyFrench-language works237,207