Quantum Field Theoretic Approach to The Unruh Effect in Rindler-Anti de-Sitter and Rotating Rindler-Anti de-Sitter Spacetimes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A peculiar prediction of quantum field theory in curved spacetime is that the existence of particles is observer dependent. This peculiarity is associated with the existence of a horizon, either the Rindler horizon due to the accelerating motion of an observer, which is the case of the Unruh effect, or the event horizon of a black hole, which is the case of the Hawking radiation. The Unruh effect predicts that an accelerating observer in the vacuum of flat spacetime will observe a thermal bath with temperature proportional to their acceleration. In this thesis, by means of the quantum field theoretic approach, we find the Unruh temperature in Rindler-AdS and rotating Rindler-AdS by calculating the expected number of particles in the AdS vacuum seen by Rindler observers. Our results for the Unruh temperatures confirm the temperatures obtained by dimensional analysis arguments in previous studies on the spacetime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".