Reaction Dynamics of Alkyl Bromides at Silicon; \tExperiment and Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physisorption and reaction at silicon surfaces of a series of brominated organic molecules: bromoethane, 1,2-dibromoethane, 1-bromopropane, 1-bromobutane and 1-bromopentane were examined by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM).\nOn Si(111)-7×7, a widely-spaced “one-per-corner-hole” pattern was observed, formed by the physisorption and reaction of several alkyl bromides. This “one-per-corner-hole” pattern suggested long-range repulsion between the adsorbates. Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, performed by others in parallel with these experiments, showed that this long-range repulsion was due to lateral charge transfer in the Si(111)-7×7 surface consequent on the physisorption of an alkyl bromide or chemisorption of a Br atom.\nThe reaction rate of bromine ‘abstraction’ (transfer of a Br-atom from the adsorbate to the silicon) was examined for two physisorbed states of 1 bromopentane on Si(111)-7×7, one vertical and one horizontal, each distinguishable by STM. The energy barrier was found to be significantly lower for abstraction of Br-atom from the vertical than for the horizontal 1 bromopentane, both for thermal and electron-induced reaction. This finding accords with previous DFT calculations for methyl bromide, for which theory exhibited a clear preference for a vertical transition state in the bromination of Si(111)-7×7.\nThe effect of alkyl chain-length on the rate of thermally-induced dissociative attachment reactions was investigated for a series of primary bromo-alkanes (bromoethane, 1-bromopropane and 1-bromobutane) on a different face of silicon; Si(100)-c(4×2). These three bromo-alkanes all physisorbed exclusively ‘inter-row’, bridging the gap between Si dimer-rows of Si(100)-c(4×2). Thermal reaction was highly ‘localized’, i.e. the chemisorbed Br-atom was formed directly below the parent bromo-alkane. The thermal barrier heights were found experimentally to increase systematically with chain length. This trend was interpreted, on the basis of DFT calculations performed by the author, as being due to the extra energy required to lift the alkyl group in going from the initial physisorbed state to the more-nearly vertical transition state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".