« à quoi sert au Canadien-Français de gagner l'univers canadien s'il perd son âme de francophone? » Représentations identitaires et mémorielles dans la presse franco-ontarienne après la âruptureâ du Canada français (1969-1986)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude de la presse en Ontario français cherche à revenir sur le débat quant à rupture du Canada français et sur l’immense fragmentation identitaire qui se serait opérée dans les communautés francophones du pays en analysant les prises de position de journaux régionaux. \n\tLa thèse relève d’importants vestiges du Canada français dans la mise en sens par les journaux des revendications franco-ontariennes, notamment en ce qui a trait à la question scolaire, aux langues officielles et au statut des minorités francophones du pays. Elle effectue aussi une tâche inédite jusqu’à présent : mettre en relation cinq hebdomadaires et un quotidien afin de mieux saisir la complexité idéologique qui caractérise le débat public franco-ontarien. L’étude montre aussi l’existence d’un comportement « nationalitaire » dans la presse qui, nourrie de la mémoire du Canada français, sert de pierre angulaire pour les revendications des Franco-Ontariens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".