MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033386358

A quarter of a millennium with Hegel. An attempt at taking stock. A Dialogue with Dieter Henrich.

2020· article· en· W7033386358 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIris (Roma Tre University) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Industrial Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegelianismQuarter (Canadian coin)Political philosophyRelevance (law)NarrativePoliticsOrder (exchange)PandemicGloom
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every important anniversary in the philosophical field–like everywhere–has its rituals, its languages, its narratives and its protagonists. Certainly, celebrating Hegel in 1970 in a Europe marked by the 1968 shift in values and in a Germany divided by the wall, had a political charge and a social impact very different from what Hegel's philosophy can apparently have today. Nevertheless, precisely the global crisis–both political-economic and social–caused by the present Coronavirus pandemic allows us to look at Hegel’s Philosophy with an even more intimate gaze. In order to evaluate Hegel's relevance in the 21st century, we will discuss with Dieter Henrich on the Hegelian philosophy and its resonances in this pandemic time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.122 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it