Séminaire de recherche MENA (Mineurs étrangers non accompagnés): accompagnements spécifiques et impasses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce rapport est le résultat d’une démarche de recherche collective. Des professionnels de différents secteurs se sont réunis durant trois journées afin de produire une analyse des questions que soulèvent le travail social auprès des MENA (Mineur Etranger Non Accompagnés) en région Wallonie-Bruxelles. Sept thématiques ont été retenues : 1. La question des mises en autonomie 2. La question de la scolarité, des formations, de l’emploi et plus largement des projets de vie 3. La question des démarches juridiques 4. L’accompagnement des fragilités, de la santé et de santé mentale 5. L’enjeu des relais et des réseaux, de la communication entre les structures, mais aussi des décalages/inégalités entre structures 6. L’enjeu de la formation (information) des travailleurs sociaux et de leurs partenaires et plus largement du cadre de travail 7. Les zones d’ombres, les incertitudes, les décalages, le manque de communication, les impasses et leurs répercussions sur les jeunes et les travailleurs
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".