MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033440422

Research, Creative Activity and Scholarship: Discovery at the University of Regina

2009· report· en· W7033440422 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueoURspace (University of Regina) · 2009
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicBuilding materials and conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's University
KeywordsScholarshipThe artsCreativitySnapshot (computer storage)Engaged scholarshipDigital scholarshipDiversity (politics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Faculty of Arts at the University of Regina is strongly committed to high quality research, creative activity and scholarship across the range of disciplines that constitute the humanities and social sciences. Research, Creative Activity, and Scholarship: Discovery at the University of Regina is a report created in May 2009 to capture a snapshot of research activity and scholarship within the Faculty. This report includes most books, book chapters, articles in refereed journal and non-refereed articles, and conference presentations since 2007 as well as the current research interests of the members of the Faculty of Arts. This report conveys the excitement, the diversity and the importance of research, creative activity and scholarship in the Faculty of Arts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueoURspace (University of Regina)Same topicBuilding materials and conservationFrench-language works237,207