The problem of the education of the reading in the last quarter of 19th century: Portugal, Brazil and the debate on pair decline/delay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo pretende investigar aspectos da difusão do método de ensino da leitura de João de Deus no Brasil durante o último quartel do século XIX. Tendo em vista a mobilização intelectual que a propaganda do método trouxe consigo, acredita-se que ele integrou um programa mais vasto de redimensionamento da tomada de consciência do tema decadência/atraso nas sociedades portuguesa e brasileira. Ao mesmo tempo, é igualmente alvo deste trabalho a persecução dos itinerários dos divulgadores do método, quando, então, a atenção se volta para os indivíduos que encetaram a viagem de transposição do Atlântico com o intuito de promover a difusão do método de João de Deus. Com isso, almeja-se mensurar a extensão do redimensionamento aludido, particularmente nos termos dos desafios da jovem nação americana em seus esforços para tomar lugar na “marcha civilizatória” do mundo ocidental.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".