Procesos sociales de trabajo en instituciones públicas : actores bifrontes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ponencia presentada en el XXIII CONGRESO DE LA ASOCIACIÓN\nLATINOAMERICANA DE SOCIOLOGÍA (ALAS), realizado en Antigua Guatemala, 29 de\noctubre-2 de noviembre de 2001. En base a Alberto L. Bialakowsky: "Marginalization and\nExclusion: The Hemisphere's Number One Problem. The challenge of the social,\neducational and health policies. Analysis and Institutional Proposals", Summer Institute\n2001, Robarts Centre for Canadian Studies, York University, Toronto, 2001: Las instituciones públicas estatales ?la escuela, el juzgado, el instituto de menores, el hospital, etc.?\nno impiden los grandes procesos sociales de exclusión, en muchos casos los reproducen, en otros los\nprofundizan. Por lo tanto, no puede pensarse un cambio sin una reflexibilidad cultural e institucional.\nEn este sentido, los trabajadores estatales implicados resultan actores bifrontes: deben trabajar en la\nreparación de la urgencia, pero deben, al mismo tiempo, crear los dispositivos institucionales que\nprotagonicen el freno al proceso social de exclusión.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.018 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".