Puzzles in international finance: Portfolio diversification and debt maturity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta tesis analiza dos características de los mercados financieros internacionales que no son totalmente comprendidos en economía: El sesgo de los portafolios de inversión hacia papeles de la misma nacionalidad del inversionista y el financiamiento de proyectos de largo plazo con deuda de corto plazo en economías emergentes. El primer capítulo considera el efecto de las perturbaciones de demanda combinadas con rigideces nominales en la formación de portafolios de inversión y cómo esto lo sesga hacia inversiones domésticas. El segundo capítulo analiza cómo la existencia de deuda de corto plazo, al generar riesgo de iliquidez, permite a los inversionistas internacionales obtener tasas de interés más altas que las que obtendrían en inversiones nacionales. Luego el capítlo presenta una explicación de cómo la estructura financiera internacional puede llevar a que el mercado genere préstamos de corto plazo para beneficiar a los inversionistas internacionales en detrimento de las economías emergentes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".