Reports on activities of RNODCs and World Data Centres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regarding the former RNODCs Mr. Gelfeld recalled that IODE-XVIII had adopted Resolution\nIODE-XVIII.2 which had abolished the system of RNODCs, but had requested also that, where\navailable, NODCs participating in Ocean Data and Information Networks (ODIN) assume the\nfunctions of former RNODCs. In addition IODE-XVIII had instructed the IODE Chair to discuss with host institutions of other RNODCs how their operations, if considered essential for the international community, could be maintained and properly acknowledged, or transferred to other Centers of the IODE network. At their February 2006 meeting the Officers had requested the former RNODCs to document the products and services that were provided by the RNODCs and to incorporate these, as relevant, in the terms of reference of the relevant ODINs. The following exceptions had been identified: RNODC for drifting buoys (Canada), JASIN (UK: to be closed), IGOSS (Japan, USA and Russia), MARPOLMON (Japan, USA and Russia), ADCP (Japan). The Officers had requested the centers that hosted the former RNODCs for drifting buoys (Canada), IGOSS (Japan, USA and Russia), MARPOLMON (Japan, USA and Russia) and ADCP (Japan) to continue their work until the next Session of IODE
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".