MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033543766

Remote sensing of drizzle onset and cloud microphysical properties in marine stratocumulus

2013· other· en· W7033543766 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish biology, ecology, and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrizzleMarine stratocumulusCloud topBoundary layerPlanetary boundary layerCloud computingRadiative transferClimate modelCloud fraction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low-level stratiform clouds remain one of the wildcards in future climate simulations. Despite their important role in the earth's radiation budget and the large number of dedicated field campaigns, several cloud-scale processes in marine stratocumulus clouds remain misrepresented. The 19-month-long deployment of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Mobile Facility in the Azores provided the longest and most comprehensive ground-based observational dataset of marine boundary layer clouds to date. The first objective of this project was the documentation of the frequency of occurrence of different cloud and precipitation systems in the Azores using a combination of passive and active measurements. The analysis indicates that, even though clouds were often observed (close to 80 % of the time), especially in the boundary layer (~50 %), a single-layer stratocumulus coverage rarely persisted more than a day. In fact, many stratocumulus clouds were observed to have cumulus clouds underneath them. This is linked to the nearly constant decoupled state of the boundary layer in the Azores, contrary to what has been observed in the Pacific decks. 35 cases of mostly single-layer persisting stratocumulus coverage were selected for further analysis. Results include similarities with other studies (e.g., maximum coverage at night, thicker clouds needed to drizzle, and importance of cloud-top radiative cooling at night), as well as differences (e.g., coherent structures account for a smaller fraction of the updraft mass flux). The second objective of this project was to revisit the detection of drizzle-size particles in stratocumulus clouds using radar observations. First, the cloud and drizzle size distributions are related theoretically to the radar measurements, including the effects of the dynamics. Then, a forward radar Doppler spectra model was developed to test the sensitivity of the radar measurements to modifications of the drizzle contribution. Finally, a simple 1-D steady-state model was exploited to simulate drizzle growth as it falls in a cloud, using the forward model to link the output back to the radar observations. Using that combination of models, some observed features of the drizzle evolution inside continental and maritime stratocumulus clouds were successfully investigated. Overall, it was found that the skewness of a radar Doppler spectrum is a good indicator of the presence of early drizzle droplets, while a reflectivity or Doppler velocity threshold indicates the change in dominance in the Doppler spectrum occurring when drizzle is well developed. The third and final objective of this project was to revisit another long-standing challenge: the retrieval of cloud microphysical properties using a combination of radar-radiometer measurements. A new technique was developed to retrieve the cloud particle size distribution in stratocumulus clouds, adding a microphysical condensational model under steady-state supersaturation conditions to a common retrieval method. The results appear reasonable in two nondrizzling marine stratocumulus clouds, and the derived cloud optical depth compares well with the one derived independently with another instrument. The errors of the retrievals were also estimated, demonstrating the added value of the new technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.148
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicFish biology, ecology, and behaviorFrench-language works237,207