MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033551398

"Raumkunst" an Bord der Lloydschiffe: das Kinderspielzimmer 1. Klasse auf der Bremen IV, gestalten von Walter Trier

2006· article· en· W7033551398 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNazismPersecutionSection (typography)GermanNazi Germany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With its two turbine-driven express steamers BREMEN and EUROPA, launched in 1929 and 1930 respectively, the Norddeutscher Lloyd set new standards in terms of both external appearance and interior furnishings. Six architects were commissioned to provide artistic drafts for the firstclass- section interior of the BREMEN. The main rooms in First Class were designed by Düsseldorf architect Fritz August Breuhaus. Breuhaus was also the designer of the children's playroom. He commissioned the artist Walter Trier, a caricaturist and illustrator of children's books, to decorate the playroom with frescoes. The year 1929 also marked the publication of the first edition of Erich Kästner's famous children’s book Emil and the Detectives, containing the illustrations by Walter Trier; they can still be found in today’s editions of the work, which continues to delight young and old alike. Walter Trier avoided persecution by the Nazis by emigrating to Canada via England. Kästner personally witnessed the burning of his books in May 1933. Even though he stayed on in Germany he was forbidden to publish any more of his work. Neither the children’s playroom nor the BREMEN itself survived the war: The ship was destroyed by fire in 1941.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)Same topicIchthyology and Marine BiologyFrench-language works237,207