MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033592584

Rapport preliminaire du secretaire du comite executif canadian de l'exposition universelle devant avoir lieu a Paris en 1855.

2014· article· fr· W7033592584 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Field (mathematics)Meaning (existential)Interpretation (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A la communication de ces documents, la chambre d'assemblée, sur motion de l'Honorable M. Young, passa une résolution, d'après laquelle une adresse fut présentée à son excellence le gouverneur général, priant son excellence de vouloir prendre les mesures nécessaires pour assurer au pays une représentation convenable de ses produits à l'exposition universelle de 1855.La réponse à cette adresse fut l'émission d'une proclamation constituant un grand comité provincial, composé de messieurs de toutes les parties du pays, aux mains desquels fut remis le soin de déterminer sur les moyens à prendre dans la circonstance.\ 18J 4 Ce comité provincial, composé d'à peu près deux cents personnes, s'assembla pour la première fois, le 30 octobre, sous la présidence de Sir Allan Napier MacNab, et nomma un sous-comité préparatoire, chargé de s'enquérir et de faire rapport le jeudi suivant, 2 novembre 1854.Ce comité était composé de Sir

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207