Sensitive Masculinities, emancipation or adaptation ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LES MASCULINITES SENSIBLES est une recherche sociologique qui propose d’enrichir les rares études critiques sur les hommes et les masculinités au prisme des rapports sociaux de sexe et de genre. A travers un voyage en France et au Québec, ce mémoire appelle à ressentir les différents éléments et les processus qui façonnent les identités de genre. C’est une invitation au cœur de collectifs contemporains issus d’univers singuliers dans le secteur du travail social, du milieu en développement personnel, du milieu militant queer ou encore de la scène artistique. Cette recherche explore les raisons qui poussent des hommes et des masculinités à se rassembler pour partager un travail réflexif qui les amènent à définir collectivement des formes de masculinités idéales et inspirantes. On y découvrira de multiples expériences émotionnelles et corporelles éprouvés par ces collectifs qui dessinent ainsi une forte motivation à se distinguer de la masculinité hégémonique virile, et que cette étude propose d’interpréter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.042 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".