MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033616171

Report of the Select Committee on the geological survey.

2014· article· en· W7033616171 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarboniferousMetamorphismGeological surveyNatural (archaeology)Sedimentary rockArctic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

most all cases, been obliged to conduct a topographical survey, as well as an ex- amination of the strata ; a fact which should not be lost sight of, as having mate- rially retarded the progress of the survey, but which at the same time has been of great use to the Province, in giving certain information as to rarely visited locali- ties, and even in correcting erroneous surveys in settled parts of the country, as is acknowledged by Mr. Russell of the Crown Lands Department in his evidence, A 775 IV REPORT ON THE Quo-.65.] who bears testimony to the great accuracy of some of Mr. Logan's surveys.During these investigations many new fossils and mineral forms have been discovered, and new facts of great interest to Geologists have been brought to light; amongst the latter may be mentioned the crustacean tracks discovered by Mr. Logan in the Potsdam Sandstone ; the chemical composition of certain fossil and recent shells, which had hitherto been thought exclusively to distinguish ihe skeletons of vertebrate animals ; the parallelism of the disturbing forces through- out the Silurian, Devonian, and carboniferous eras ; and more particularly, the re- searches on the metamorphism of rocks, which seem to establish with certainty, that not only the crystalline formations of the great Apalachian Chain, but also the still older rocks which separate the St. Lawrence from the Arctic Ocean, are merely stratified sedimentary deposits in an altered condition.Of more immediate practical interest is the knowledge gained of the mi- neral wealth of our country.Besidesbuilding materials of all kinds, and limestone, the discovery of which in some parts is of as much practical value as that of gold itself, there is the copper of Lakes Huron and Superior, ihe slates, mar- bles, serpentines, soapstones, and iron and copper ores of the mineral region south of the St. Lawrence, and the magnetic iron ores of the Laurentine formation, of greater extent and value than exist probably in the rest of the known world.Upon the whole, with the single exception of coal, the Canadas, on the testimony Ques.37.] of Professor Hall, have been shewn to stand higher in respect of their mineral products than any of the surrounding states.All these and numerous other economic materials, a list of which is given in the report of 1849, 1850, and the description of the London Exhibition of 1851, if not actually first discovered by the survey, have been made generally known, the formations which vield them pointed out, and in many instances the localities, where they can be profit- ably worked, indicated.Whilst the survey was in progress, a very large collection of specimens has has been brought together, with the intention of illustrating, not only the science of Canadian Geology, but its practical application in the supply of useful materi- als, the whole of which are now deposited at the house of the survey at Mon- treal.Such is the present result of the Canadian Geological Survey, and although much remains to be done, considering the vast extent of country under examina- tion, the difficulties presenled by the uninhabited state of much of it, the total ab- sence of reliable topographical maps, and the short period of each year which our climate renders available for the field work, your Committee think they may pronounce with confidence, that in no part of the world has there been a more valuable contribution to geological science for such a small outlay, (hardly more than 20,000 in all.)In confirmation of this opinion your Committee would refer to the letter of Professor Agassiz, and the evidence of Professor Hall, [Ques. 5. and to the opinions of scientific men quoted by Mr. Logan, and Mr. [Ques.101.Ques.3.] Hunt.They beg also to add two other quotations, as shewing the esti- mation in which our survey is held by men of science in England and France." In Canada especially, there has been proceeding for some years one of the most extensive and important Geological Surveys now going on in ihe world.The en- thusiasm and disinterestedness of a thoroughly qualified and judicious observer, Mr. Logan, whose name will ever stand high in the roll of votaries of his favorite science, have conferred upon this great

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207