MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033635842

Restoration of native-dominated plant communities on a Centaurea stoebe L.-infested site

2018· article· en· W7033635842 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarWorks - GVSU (Grand Valley State University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNative plantSpecies richnessIntroduced speciesForbPlant communityInvasive speciesClopyralid
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Questions: Restoring native-dominated plant communities often requires controlling invasive species, reintroducing native species, and implementing continued management practices. Can single herbicide applications to control Centaurea stoebe L. encourage establishment of seeded native species more effectively than a single mowing? Can annual hand pulling to control C. stoebe favor the persistence of seeded native species? Can mid-spring burning reduce C. stoebe and increase native forbs and grasses? After eight years, will the restored plant communities differ from those in untreated areas? Location: Bass River Recreation Area, Ottawa County, MI, USA. Methods: We studied the effects of site preparation (mowing, clopyralid, glyphosate), hand pulling of C. stoebe, and burning on restoring native plant communities on a C. stoebe-infested site. Over eight years, we quantified the development of the plant communities on plots seeded with native grasses and forbs, and report on the second four years here. Results: Native-dominated plant communities developed using both herbicides, but while clopyralid provided longer control of C. stoebe, clopyralid-treated plots had fewer native species than glyphosate-treated plots. Native-dominated plant communities also developed on plots that were only mowed once before seeding, achieving similar native species richness as the glyphosate treatment. Hand pulling controlled C. stoebe, burning increased relative cover of native graminoids and decreased that of non-native grasses, and hand pulling and burning in combination increased relative cover of native forbs. After eight years, the restored plant communities had greater native species cover and richness and higher mean Coefficient of Conservatism, Floristic Quality Index, and Shannon's Diversity Index values than untreated areas. Conclusions: Site preparation, seeding, hand pulling of C. stoebe, and annual burning facilitated restoration of native-dominated plant communities on a C. stoebe-infested site. Effects accumulated over a period of eight years, illustrating the importance of continued management and monitoring as part of similar restoration efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarWorks - GVSU (Grand Valley State University)Same topicBiological Control of Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207