MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033651818

Report on the drainage and sewerage of the City of Montreal, shewing the location, and estimated cost of the system of main outlet and intercepting sewers proposed to be constructed for the thorough and effectual drainage of the city.

2014· article· en· W7033651818 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHuman Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101LiquationDiafiltrationDysgeusiaEmperipolesisTriacetinDemotion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the Quarterly Meeting of Council, held at the City Hall on 9th of September, 1856, a Resolution was passed to the effect that the City Surveyor be instructed to make such examinations and surveys of the City as would enable him to project and lay down such a system of main sewers as would thoroughly and effectually drain the City, and to submit plans, sections and estimates of the cost of said main sewers so required.* The plans, sections, and detailed drainings of the sewers have not been litfr >- graphed, owing to the cost and delay of time which would be incurred by so doing; but a topographical plan of the City, shewing the position and direction of all the main sewers, as well as the valley of the River St. Pierre, has been lithographed, and is attached, to illustrate this Report.water and sewerage passes into the river.Should it be possible to lay down a system of which the old sewers would form a part, then a great saving would arise from not having the portion of the old sewers retained to construct anew.It is evident, then, the first ground of inquiry should be as to the present state of the main sewers, their levels and construction, and generally whether they would be of any value in a properly extended sys- tem such as the one about to be proposed.The whole of the sewerage, soil water and rain water, passes into the river now through three outlets, representing three of the largest natural drainages into which the City is divided.The first, and by far the largest of these, outlets into the Elgin Basin, opposite the Custom House.It takes the whole of the drainage of the City lying between St. Lawrence Main Street and the ridge dividing the waters of the creek which runs by the Lachine Railway sta- tion from the River St. Pierre, the waters of the swamp under Coteau Baron ; as well as the drainage of Point St. Charles which comes through the Culvert under the Canal.These seve- ral drainages unite at Dow's Brewery, and flows through the College grounds in an open channel to St. Ann's Market, and from thence in a covered culvert, built of stone, and arched over, to the outlet at the Elgin Basin.It will be seen that a large portion of this sewerage water flows in open courses, the sides and banks of which are very dirty, from the accumulation of filth of all kinds from time to time deposited there and left by the water, when its depth and flow was not strong enough to remove it.This drainage division of the City embraces Griifintown and the most thickly populated portion of the Craig Street valley.The rainwater and sewerage of the Craig Street valley from Saint Lawrence Main Street, flows through the main sewer known as the Craig StreetTunnelto St. Antoine Bridge, and thence in open cut to Chaboillez Square and Dow's Brewery, joining the creek coming by the Lachine Railway station, mentioned before, shew- ing that at Dow's Brewery the principal drainages of this division meet and unite in one stream.The Craig Street Tunnel Sewer, between St. Lawrence Main Street and St. Antoine Bridge, was originally a circle of about 7 feet diameter, constructed of 8 inch brick work in common mortar.From quick sand having been * This old sewer can be made available for the drainage of this district, should it be thought advisable to delay the construction of the new main sewer which would occupy its place, and running west to Visitation Street, until the other main sewers are laid down, and when the district by being built on would, for drainage purposes, require it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicHuman Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207