Stöðug, stöðug streita : reynsla kvenna af heimilisofbeldi á meðgöngu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies indicate that domestic abuse seriously impacts well-being and general health of women.The purpose of this study was to increase the knowledge and deepen the understanding of domestic abuse during pregnancy.The research method is a qualitative, phenomenological method, known as the Vancouver School of doing Phenomenology.Twelve Icelandic women, aged 19 -72, mean age 37 ½, with a history of domestic abuse participated in the study and were interviewed once or twice, in all 15 interviews.Results of this study show that living in an abusive relationship involves constant stress and does have serious consequences.Findings were divided into three main themes: Man, woman, child, where attempts were made to describe the violence of the man, as well as the woman´s experience of the consequences of the violence on her and her children.The abuse started as soon as the relationship began, first emotionally then physically, sexually or finanically.All the women felt ashamed because of the abuse and felt they didn´t have any respect in their homes.They have suffered from anxiety and depression as well as lack of self-confidence.When they got pregnant the situation worsened and they felt that they were stuck in the relationsship.The women have had flashbacks and nightmares for many years after the abusive relationsship has ended.All their children witnessed the abuse and were seriously affected.Increased knowledge and understanding is important for midwives and other health professionals so they can identify the symptoms and consequences of abusive relationsships and help women in time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".