Review: A Publication of LMDA, the Literary Managers and Dramaturgs of the Americas, volume 17, issue 1
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents include: Editor's Page: A Note from New LMDA President, Brian Quirt; Think Dramaturgically, Act Locally! A Conference Overview; I Was Mugged at My First LMDA Conference; First-Timer Fragments; Conference Photos; Introducing the Lessing (and Joe and Michael); A Message Faxed from Romania; Acceptance Speech, Michael Lupu; Producing The Belle's Stratagem; Dramaturging Justice: The Exonerated Project at the Alley Theatre; Past President Liz Engeleman: Some Appreciations; The Toronto Mini-Conference (reprinted from the LMDA Canada newsletter); Gateway to the Americas, The LMDA Delegation, A Report from Mexico; Imag[in]ing Poverty: Creative Critical Dramaturgy for Suzan-Lori Parks's In the Blood; Hester, La Negrita in Iowa City, Staging "Spells" and Homelessness in Suzan-Lori Parks's In the Blood; The Future of Theatre is...(a creative contest); Seventh Annual Call for LMDA Residency Proposals.\nIssue editors: D.J. Hopkins, Madeleine Oldham, Carlenne Lacosta
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it