Search for D<sup>0</sup>-DÌ<sup>0</sup>Mixing and a Measurement of the Doubly Cabibbo-Suppressed Decay Rate in D<sup>0</sup>â KÏ Decays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present results of a search for [Formula presented] mixing and a measurement of [Formula presented] , the ratio of doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays to Cabibbo-favored decays, using [Formula presented] decays from [Formula presented] of data collected near [Formula presented] with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II collider. At the [Formula presented] confidence level, allowing for [Formula presented] violation, we find the mixing parameters [Formula presented] and [Formula presented], and the mixing rate [Formula presented] . In the limit of no mixing, [Formula presented] and the [Formula presented] -violating asymmetry [Formula presented]. © 2003 The American Physical Society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it