MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033711195

Relations entre la pratique des routines familiales, le style d'attachement maternel,
\nl'adaptation du parent et l'adaptation des enfants d'âge scolaire

2012· dissertation· fr· W7033711195 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDepositum (Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPublic Procurement and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationContext (archaeology)NucleofectionFrugality
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une recension portant sur 50 ans de recherche sur les routines familiales révèle, entre
\nautres, leur impact sur la santé et l'adaptation psychosociale, tant des parents que des
\nenfants (Fiese et al., 2002). Peu d'informations sur la pratique des routines familiales de
\nla population québécoise sont disponibles. Par le fait même, le profil des relations entre
\nles routines pratiquées par les familles québécoises et d'autres facteurs familiaux et
\nindividuels est peu connu. Les routines familiales ont un rôle de médiation dans le cas de
\nplusieurs phénomènes pouvant toucher les membres d'une famille (Kwok et al., 2006;
\nGuidubaldi et al., 1986; Hawkins, 1997; Haugland, 2005; Greening et al., 2007). Les
\ndonnées de cette recherche ont été collectées auprès de 125 dyades mère-enfant
\nprovenant de 93 familles. Les enfants (69 filles et 56 garçons) étaient âgés de 5 à 12 ans.
\nDes hypothèses ont été vérifiées afin de prédire la pratique des routines familiales, le
\nstress parental ainsi que l'adaptation de l'enfant. Les routines familiales ont été mesurées
\nselon leur fréquence et l'importance accordée avec le FRI, le niveau de stress parental
\navec l'ISP et l'adaptation de l'enfant avec le CBCL. Les analyses de régression multiple
\nhiérarchique révèlent que les routines familiales sont prédites par le niveau de scolarité de
\nla mère et elles prédisent elle-mêmes les compétences de l'enfant. Le niveau de stress
\nparental de la mère est quant à lui prédit par la présence de troubles externalisés et un
\nfaible niveau de compétences chez son enfant mais également par le SSÉ familial et
\nl'évitement dans le style d'attachement maternel. La fréquence des routines familiales, le
\nniveau de scolarité de la mère ainsi qu'un faible stress parental permettent de prédire les
\ncompétences de l'enfant. Les variables prédictrices des difficultés d'adaptation de
\nl'enfant sont le stress parental et le SSÉ familial. De plus, des analyses complémentaires
\nmontrent que les routines familiales n'ont pas de rôle de modération entre les variables à
\nl'étude. Par ailleurs, les analyses mettent en lumière le rôle médiateur des routines entre
\nla scolarité de la mère et les compétences de l'enfant. Ces résultats doivent être pris en
\ncompte par les intervenants psychosociaux puisque les routines familiales sont des
\npratiques faciles d'enseignement aux familles et ayant une portée significative sur le
\nbien-être des enfants et de la mère dans l'exercice de son rôle. A review covering 50 years of research on family routines demonstrated their impacts on
\nhealth and psychosocial adjustment among both parents and children (Fiese et al., 2002).
\nHowever, there is little information available concerning the practice of family routines
\nin Quebec, thus the relationships between the routines that Quebec families practice and
\nether family and individual factors remain poorly understood. Family routines play a
\nmediating role in many experiences that may affect family members (Kwok et al., 2006;
\nGuidubaldi et al., 1986; Hawkins, 1997; Haugland, 2005; Greening et al., 2007). For this
\nstudy, data were collected from 125 mother-child dyads in 93 families. The children (69
\ngirls and 56 boys) were between 5 and 12 years old. Hypotheses were tested to predict
\nthe family routines, parental stress and adaptation of the child. Family routines were
\nmeasured by frequency and the importance given with the IRF, the level of parenting
\nstress with PSI and the adaptation of the child with the CBCL. The hierarchical multiple
\nregression analyzes revealed that family routines are predicted by the level of maternal
\neducation and that they predict the skills of the child. The level of parental stress of the
\nmother is in turn predicted by the presence of externalizing problems and low levels of
\nskills in her child but also by family SES and avoidance in the style of maternal
\nattachment. The frequency of family routines, the level of maternal education and low
\nparental stress predict the skills of the child. The predictors of adjustment problems in
\nchildren are parenting stress and SES. Bivariate and multivariate analyzes were
\nperformed and the results show that family routines play a mediating role between the
\nmother's education and the child's skills. These results should be taken into account by
\nsocial and mental health workers, because family routines can be easily taught to families
\nand have significant impacts on the well-being of children and of mothers as they try to
\nfulfill their role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.007
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it