MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7033715109

Report of the Second External Program and Management Review (EPMR) of the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)

2011· report· en· W7033715109 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · 2011
Typereport
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsortium of International Agricultural Research CentersInternational Livestock Research InstituteInternational Fund for Agricultural DevelopmentNew Partnership for Africa's DevelopmentOverseas Development InstituteInternational Development Research CentreInter-American Institute for Global Change ResearchInternational Fine Particle Research InstituteIndian Council of Agricultural ResearchWorld Agroforestry CentreInternational Centre for Integrated Mountain Development
KeywordsLivestockInformation technologyInformation system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conclusion and Decisions:• The CGIAR endorsed the ExCo recommendations on the 2 nd ILRI EPMR.• Concerning the global expansion of ILRI, the CGIAR cautioned that it should be an evolutionary process and should be within the framework of a well-structured and financed strategic plan.It welcomed the pro-active response of the Center management on partnerships.It also noted the importance for ILRI to share lessons from its positive EPMR with other Centers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.056
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0560.062
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0120.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research)→Same topicPlant and animal studies→French-language works237,207→