Season 14 Episode 20 - Haida Gwaii - Island of the People
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The most isolated landmass in Canada is a unique area off the northwest coast of BC, consisting of over\n200 separate islands. Known geographically as the Queen Charlottes, this area is home to the people of the\nHaida Nation. The Haida are known among the many West Coast nations as gifted artists, carpenters and\nboat builders. Having suffered the loss of 95% of their population after European contact, they are also a\ntestament to survival.\nToday a wave of new artists are rediscovering the supernatural beauty behind the ancient stories, using\nthem for inspiration to create amazing works of art. Painters, weavers, and totem pole carvers carry the day\nas the Haida express themselves creatively and politically. Now their single biggest battle is to raise\nawareness of the serious threat posed by extensive forestry on their island home. Artists like Jim Hart,\nJaalen Edenshaw, Marcel Rust, Sherri Dick, and Mick Morrison share age-old inspiration and a duty to\nprotect Haida Gwaii, Island of The People. By reclaiming their traditional ways, the spirit and strength of the\nHaida is plainly evident in their stories, songs, and powerful works of art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".