MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033769970

The River as Border in Montserrat Fontes' First Confession

2022· article· es· W7033769970 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientia Insularum Revista de Ciencias Naturales en islas · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfession (law)CulminationQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El río como símbolo positivo de fertilidad, renovación eterna y fuente de vida, ha sido,
\nentre otros, uno de los símbolos más recurrentes en el devenir de la historia humana, y
\nconsecuentemente, de la literatura universal. No obstante, esta concepción positiva y casi
\nmítica del río, difiere notablemente cuando analizamos la historia y la realidad de la comunidad
\nchicana. Materializado en la imagen del Río Grande, el río se convierte en una de las
\nmás profundas y dolorosas fronteras de la realidad de dicha comunidad. Este es el caso de la
\nnovela de Montserrat Fontes, First Confession (1991), una historia que describe la vida de
\ndos niños de la clase alta mejicana, quienes ofrecen una visión muy particular del río, así
\ncomo de lo que representa en sus vidas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it