Self-report and performance measures differ in their association with home care use : an exploratory study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Functional status measures are used extensively to determine the home care needs and eligibility of older adults.However, it is unclear what type of functional status measure is best for these objectives.The purpose of this secondary analysis of the 2001 Aging in Manitoba t ongitudinal Study survey and linked Manitoba Health administrative data was to investigate the concurrent and longitudinl relationship between three different measures of functional status and the formal home care use of older Manitobans.Analysis was structured with the Andersen-Newman Framework of Health Services Utilization (1973) as a guide.ln these small exploratory study results, the self-report of capacity measure appeared most associated with home care use cross-sectionally, while the performance measure was best able to predict home care use two and a half years following the functional status assessment.Results emphasize that different types of functional status measures are not interchangeable.......
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it