MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033787558

On-Road Remote Sensing of Automobile Emissions in the La Brea Area: Year 3, October 2003

2004· article· en· W7033787558 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSound Ideas (University of Puget Sound) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccelerationBox modelVolume (thermodynamics)Air mass (solar energy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The University of Denver conducted a five-day remote sensing study in the La Brea, California area in October of 2003. The remote sensor used in this study measures the ratios of CO, HC, and NO to CO2 in motor vehicle exhaust. From these ratios, we calculate the percent concentrations of CO, CO2, HC and NO in the exhaust that would be observed by a tailpipe probe, corrected for water and any excess oxygen not involved in combustion. Mass emissions per mass or volume of fuel can also be determined. The system used in this study was configured to determine the speed and acceleration of the vehicle, and was accompanied by a video system to record the license plate of the vehicle.\nFive days of fieldwork, October 27-31, 2003, were conducted as vehicles entered I-10 eastbound frontage road from La Brea Blvd. in west Lost Angles basin. A database was compiled containing 25,847 records. Of these records, the State of California provided make and model year information on 20,191 which contained valid measurements for at least CO and CO2, and most contained valid measurements for HC and NO as well. The database, as well as others compiled by the University of Denver, can be found at www.feat.biochem.du.edu.\nThe mean percent CO, HC, and NO were determined to be 0.34%, 0.012%, and 0.032%, respectively. The emissions measurements in this study exhibit a gamma distribution, with the dirtiest 10% of the measurements responsible for 72.2%, 60.3%, and 59.3% of the CO, HC, and NO emissions, respectively. The HC readings contain a 35 ppm offset, which has been used to reduce all of the measured HC values for comparisons.\nVehicle emissions as a function of vehicle specific power revealed that NO emissions show a flat dependence on specific power when speed and acceleration are measured after emissions. This is quite possibly a result of increased CO emissions in the same VSP range. HC emissions show a negative dependence on specific power – the expected trend. CO emissions show a positive dependence on specific power in the range from 5 to 30 kW/tonne.\nUsing vehicle specific power, the emissions from the vehicle fleet measured in 2003 were adjusted to match the vehicle driving patterns of the fleet measured in 1999. After doing so, it was seen that the emissions measured in the current year are lower than those measured during 1999. Model year adjustments gave equivocal results.\nA new analysis looked at vehicle emission levels as a function of the type of transmission the vehicle uses. It suggests that when comparing emissions between E-23 sites one may need to consider transmission type in addition to age and vsp. Since, even after age adjustments are made, manual transmission equipped vehicles at La Brea had more than twice the average CO, 40% higher HC and 20% higher NO emissions.\nAn analysis of high emitting vehicles showed that there is considerable overlap of CO and HC high emitters, for instance 3.7% of the measurements contribute 36% of the total CO and 35% of the total HC. The noise levels in the CO, HC and NO measurement channels were determined to be within acceptable limits that were minimal when compared to the standard error of the mean of the measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)Same topicInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFrench-language works237,207