S1-E8 - uOttawa Design Day! From Civil Engineering to IoT in Health Care with Michel (Mitch) Bouchard
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Episode 8For this episode we're back at the University of Ottawa for the Faculty of Engineering's Design Day! Design Day is an event which showcases engineering design projects and celebrates the achievements of our students.Today we'll be meeting with two teams that are taking part in Design Day and one of our judges, making the format a bit different as we had to record the discussions individually.Timestamp1:22-Introduction to the episode and Design Day. 2:20- The Fall Collection project and team. 5:54- How their project works. 12:10- The challenges they faced. 16:20-Adapting the project to the client. 17:30- Introduction to the 2nd team. 20:30- What is the project they built. 27:30-The surprises they faced. 28:45-Introduction to Michel (Mitch) Bouchard a 2001 alumni from Mechanical Engineering and Design Day judge. 30:50-Elaboration on the projects he saw.----more----Produced by uOttawa Faculty of Engineering.Make The Future
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.059 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".