MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033816674

Sea-Floor Power Generation System

2007· other· en· W7033816674 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)Instrumentation (computer programming)Marine energyPower (physics)Ocean currentElectronic circuitElectricity generationEnergy (signal processing)Electric power system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocean currents represent a potentially significant, \ncurrently untapped, resource of energy. The total worldwide power \nin ocean currents has been estimated to be about 5,000 GW, with \npower densities of up to 15 kW/m2. In the paper we describe a micro \nsea-floor power generation system being designed and developed at \nElectrical Energy System Lab, Memorial University of \nNewfoundland. The ocean current data around Newfoundland \nshows a significantly low non-tidal ocean current speed (in the \nrange of 0.11-0.15m/s) at various depths. We would like to extract \nfew watts electrical from the sea-floor ocean current. The produced \npower is required for the data processing computer and signal \nconditioning circuits of sea-floor instrumentation. The proposed \npower generation system will consist of a spiral shape drag type \nturbine rotor, a low rpm generator, batteries for energy storage, a \ncontrolled DC-DC converter, instrumentation and a micro \ncontroller based control system for the turbine. This paper describes \nprogress made so far. We present some ocean current data, design \nand lab test results of our first proto-type sea-floor power generation \nsystem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207