Speaker Series on Aboriginal Issues 2016: Dragons and Tricksters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dragons and Tricksters: An Intersection of Chinese and First Nations Culture, Philosophy, and Leadership\n\nPresented by William G. Lindsay (Cree-Stoney), Director, Office for Aboriginal Peoples, SFU And PhD Student, Faculty of Education, SFU\n\nIn components of his PhD research, William Lindsay has found philosophical similarities between aspects of classical Chinese thought and practice and traditional First Nations thought and practice. Included in this has been a discovery that aspects of traditional leadership skills from both cultures intersect in places and are applicable in his work 'Indigenizing' a university. In addition to this, he has personally experienced and observed in these modern times an overlap and intersection of the culture and life experience of Chinese and First Nations people.\n\nThis lecture - tying aspects of these two cultural threads together - will consider the question: What fascinating observations can be made and what personal, philosophical, and leadership lessons can be contrasted, compared, and shared through this cross-cultural intersection? As part of this presentation, the 22 minute documentary short film 'Cedar and Bamboo' will be shown. This fascinating documentary recounts the life experiences of four descendants of mixed heritage and explores the unique relationships shared by early Chinese immigrants and First Nations peoples on Canada's west coast.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it