Spatio-temporal distribution of Prorocentrum lima in coastal waters of the gulf of Maine: A two-year survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dinoflagellate Prorocentrum lima (Ehrenberg) Dodge was found at several sites along the coast of Maine in 1998 and 1999, some in areas where shellfish are harvested commercially. Identity was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Although this dinoflagellate is known to produce toxins (okadaic acid and derivative compounds), incidence of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning in coastal Maine is not well understood, despite confirmed toxicity events in the early 1990s in Nova Scotia, Canada in adjoining waters to the north. Some samples containing the dinoflagellate came from wild mussel populations collected at low tide, while others originated from aquaculture sites. Many of the cells were isolated from water samples and net tows and on a few occasions were associated with filamentous macroalgae. Prorocentrum lima appears to be relatively rare in Maine coastal waters, but its widespread distribution over several months warrants increased monitoring to allay public health concerns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".