MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033977901

Suivi de l'ATP et des protéines du biofilm dans un bioréacteur a lit fluidisé fermentant un perméat de lactosérum reconstitué

2002· other· fr· W7033977901 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2002
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodFusible alloyTSG101Articular cartilage damageDiafiltration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La production de fromage entraîne le rejet d'énormes quantités de résidus. Le perméat de lactosérum est une solution riche en lactose et en minéraux convenable pour la fermentation. Les réacteurs anaérobies en continu sont très efficaces pour la production d'acide propionique par Propionibacterium acidipropionici; cependant, les paramètres permettant de mesurer l'activité de dégradation de la DCO et la production d'acides organiques volatils ne sont pas au point. Cette étude apporte une lumière nouvelle sur la relation entre la quantité de protéines et la concentration d'adénosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) pour l'évaluation de l'activité d'un bioréacteur à lit fluidisé en continu. Il y est démontré que la concentration d'ATP dans le biofilm explique mieux l'activité de diminution de la teneur en lactose exprimée en équivalents glucose et la production d'acides gras volatils que la quantité de protéines du biofilm. Une méthode novatrice de coloration et de photographie du biofilm y est aussi explorée. \n \n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.143
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicCultural Heritage Materials AnalysisFrench-language works237,207