Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDiverse Legal and Medical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsNuclear PhysicsComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTechnische Universität DortmundAkademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanislawa StaszicaCanarieHarvard UniversityUniversità della CalabriaUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaEuropean Social FundCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityEuropean Regional Development FundCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftIsrael Science FoundationMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoGeneralitat de CatalunyaGeneralitat ValencianaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesState Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and ElectronicsTechnische Universität DresdenInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesUniversité de GenèveJustus Liebig Universität GießenOntario Innovation TrustScottish Universities Physics AllianceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAgence Nationale de la RechercheUniversity of GlasgowFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloLeverhulme TrustEuropean CommissionCERNCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaChinese University of Hong KongCompute CanadaUniversity of Hong KongAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungHigh Energy PhysicsTRIUMFGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceShandong UniversityShanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and CosmologyFondation Partager le SavoirSouthern Methodist UniversityDanmarks GrundforskningsfondUniversität Heidelberg
KeywordsHiggs bosonLarge Hadron ColliderAtlas detectorBosonDetectorAtlas (anatomy)
DOInot available
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexNo abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.999
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it