Scoperta di un piccolo periptero dorico di primo V sec. a.C. nel quartiere nord-occidentale di Paestum: nota preliminare
Bibliographic record
Abstract
www.fastionline.org/docs/FOLDER-it-2020-475.pdfThe Journal of Fasti Online (ISSN 1828-3179) ● Published by the Associazione Internazionale di Archeologia Classica ●Palazzo Altemps, Via Sant’Appolinare 8–00186 Roma ● Tel. / Fax: ++39.06.67.98.798 ● http://www.aiac.org; http://www.fastionline.orgScoperta di un piccolo periptero dorico di primo V sec. a.C. nel quartiere nord-occidentale di Paestum: nota preliminareGabriel Zuchtriegel1, Enzo Rizzo2,3, Francesco Soldovieri4, Luigi Capozzoli2, Ilaria Cata-pano4, Gregory De Martino2, Giovanni Ludeno4, Gianluca Gennarelli4, Francesco Uliano Scelza1, Cristiano Benedetto De Vita5, Ottavia Voza61Parco Archeologico di Paestum e Velia, Ministero dei Beni e delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo2CNR-IMAA, Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale, Tito (PZ)3Università di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Fisica e Scienze della Terra, Ferrara4CNR-IREA, Istituto per il Rilevamento Elettromagnetico dell’Ambiente, Napoli5Dottore Archeologo6Architetto professionistaThe paper discusses the discovery of a small Doric temple dating from the early fifth century BC in Paestum, southern Italy. Surface finds belonging to the temple were first noted in 2019 during restauration work on the ancient city walls of Pae-stum. Analysis of aerial imagery and geophysical prospection has made it possible to locate the site of temple in the north-west quarter of the ancient city near the fortification wall. The area is currently under excavation. The present paper sum-marizes what we know so far based on prospection data and on more than 230 fragments that can be attributed to the temple, including fragments of the stylobate, columns, capitals, architrave, frieze, geison and sima. The temple, which ap-pears to have been a small peripteros with 4 x 7 columns, shedsnew light on the development of Doric architecture and building techniques in Paestum between the Archaic and the early Classical period
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".