MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034060339

Risks & Responsibilities: The Complexities of Enabling Safety & Harm Reduction at Music Festivals

2022· dissertation· en· W7034060339 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicConservation Techniques and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Music festivalHarmEthnographyHarm reductionLiminalityLiabilityRisk management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this thesis is to examine the risks and subsequent harm reduction strategies that occur at music festivals with a focus on Western Canada. Music festivals are liminal spaces that form temporary communities in bounded locations, and as such are sites that see decreased inhibitions and increased risks. Using critical-interpretive medical anthropology as the framework, these risks are analyzed and grouped based on their impact − risks to the individual body, physically and mentally, and risks to the community as a whole. Instead of looking at each risk in isolation, a holistic approach in this context specifically is essential due to the interrelated and compounding nature of these potential harms. This framework also provides the basis for the second half of this thesis, which interrogates the entangled and often contradicting responsibilities at play for mitigating these risks.\n\nUsing a rapid ethnographic research design, three music festivals were chosen as the field sites for this research, with each festival located in a different province (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan) to allow for comparative policy analysis. This comparison helped to illuminate just how varied the experiences at different festivals can be. There is largely no formal regulation on risk mitigation at mass gathering events such as music festivals, outside of fire or alcohol safety. This absence forces festival organizers to engage with the securitization of habitat, as per Nikolas Rose, resulting in different harm reduction strategies and risk priorities at each event. In turn, through governmentality, many patrons have internalized responsibility for both themselves and those around them. Additionally, festivals and governments with prohibitionist stances on drug use, rather than harm reduction grounded in prevention and realism, are unintentionally contributing to more dangerous risk behaviours. My research demonstrates that all the different parties involved − individuals, communities, organizers, and governments − need to communicate and be on the same page in order to create and enable sustainable safety at music festivals. This is currently not the case in Canada, where criminalization and enforcement are still fundamental structures hindering harm reduction, contributing to the escalating risks created by the unregulated drug market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicConservation Techniques and StudiesFrench-language works237,207