Some behaviour patterns of Trumpeter Swans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Behaviour of habituated and imprinted Trumpeter Swans was studied in southern Ontario.Trumpeters have an aversion to physical contact which causes frustration at the time of copulation.The swans use displacement bathing as a pre-copulatory display.Male Trumpeters have control over the moult of primary feathers and can "let go" at an opportune moment.The wing-rattling threat displays of Trumpeters are derived from displacement drying behaviour after bathing.Very loud duetting by pairs or companions proclaims the presence of a predator.Trumpeters fight by grasping the feathers of the upper back and striking simultaneously with both wings.These blows usually fall on either side of the opponent and do not connect with the body.Injury seems to be very rare.Brood dominance hierarchies are established by size but those of equal size may be determined by brief fights.Large broods may have difficulty in recognising differences in brood size and may confront one another by crowding with very loud trumpeting until one brood finally gives way.In response to stress or arousal, swans lift one or both closed wings above the back.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".