MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034085748

Surface Spills Associated with Oil and Gas Activities in Saskatchewan and Potential Impacts to Shallow Groundwater Resources

2021· dissertation· en· W7034085748 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterGeospatial analysisExtraction (chemistry)Hydrology (agriculture)Hydraulic fracturingUnconventional oilFossil fuelResource (disambiguation)Petroleum
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite record oil production in Saskatchewan (SK), Canada over the last two decades, as well as emerging evidence of oilfield spills and concomitant public scrutiny, there has not been a detailed analysis conducted on the data surrounding the spatiotemporal distribution of spills, the identification of the source of spills, and the potential risks from spills to shallow groundwater supplies within the province. This lack of detailed analysis has contributed to the prevailing assumption within SK that oilfield spills are mainly associated with more recent high volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF) activities, particularly in the Bakken Formation, as they are considered to be inherently riskier than older conventional extraction techniques (e.g., enhanced oil recovery (EOR)). The intent of this thesis is to provide a more informed understanding of the potential impacts associated with conventional and unconventional extraction activities as they pertain to shallow groundwater resources.\nThis thesis draws primarily on the SK Upstream Oil and Gas Integrated Resource Information System (IRIS) Incident Report dataset. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed to analyze temporal trends of the spills and oil and gas extraction activities from 1990 to 2019. Multiple regression analyses and geospatial modeling were applied to the spilled volumes to correlate their variability to the production intensity and analyze how these relationships vary spatially. The potential environmental risk of produced water (PW) spills was evaluated by characterizing the proximity of these incidents to water supply wells while considering surficial geologic properties and estimating the timescales over which contaminants will infiltrate the subsurface and be transported to shallow groundwater wells. \nThere have been 24,878 oil and PW spills reported to the Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources totaling 4.10 x 105 m3. This includes a cumulative volume of spilled oil and PW of 9.20 x 104 m3 (22.5%) and 3.17 x 105 m3 (77.5%), respectively. Results of this thesis show that although there was a statistically significant increasing trend (p = 2e-05) in the Bakken producing well count from 1990 to 2019, there was no discernable pattern for spilled PW volumes (p = 0.1), which also holds true when comparing median spilled PW volumes pre and post Bakken HVHF boom (2006) (p = 0.2). Oil spillage had a statistically significant decreasing trend (p = 5e-04) overall with larger median spilled volumes before the beginning of the Bakken production boom as compared to after (p = 0.01). This indicates that Bakken oil production is not the predominant cause of surface spills. Additionally, multiple regression analysis revealed that total spilled volumes of PW and oil are closely and positively correlated with total production intensity volumes (R2 = 0.56 and R2 = 0.44, respectively) regardless of the method of production, further supporting that HVHF is not inherently riskier than conventional production in SK.\nIn conjunction with the above results, this thesis determined that the majority of recorded groundwater wells (>50%) were located within 1 km of one or more PW spills. Just over 38% of these wells were shallow (0.3-20 m deep) which are most at risk for brine contamination from surface spills. While there is potential for brine contamination in all surficial features within the study area, areas with glacial tills (southeastern SK, hydraulic conductivity (K) range (10-11 - 10-7 m/s)) are less likely to experience contamination than areas with coarse-grained outwash sediments (west-central and west-southwestern SK, K range (10-5 - 10-3 m/s)). This conclusion was based on Darcy’s Law estimations of transit times through different surficial sediments; clay-rich till and glaciolacustrine deposits exhibited a time scale of thousands of years extending up to one million years while coarse-grained outwash sediments exhibited transit times of less than 10 years when the hydraulic gradient was relatively high (i = 0.1).\nThe results of this thesis indicate that production from the Bakken is not the predominant source of surface spills in SK as is commonly assumed, that surface spills may also be associated with a variety and lengthy history of hydrocarbon exploration and production activities, and that long-term monitoring for potential brine contamination of drinking water resources should cover the full range of extraction activities. Not only will this analysis help decision-makers to focus on areas of concern that are most sensitive to saline contamination from PW spills through regulatory, preventative, and remedial efforts, but also addresses the issues from more than a century of oil and gas development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207