MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034088050

A study of the factors affecting the growth in real estate investment in Malaysia / Norazlin Kamarulzaman

2016· other· en· W7034088050 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicScarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReal estateInvestment (military)Consumption (sociology)Inflation (cosmology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Capitalization ratePopulationInterest rate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Briefly, the Malaysian economy is expected to be resilient and still show significant growth while the global economy gives cause for concern on several fronts. Real estate investment refers as "real estate market" that represents a significant portion of people's wealth and becomes true for many real estate investors in Malaysia. This plays an important role in providing employment opportunities, improving income distribution, offering shelter to households and reduced poverty. However, the real estate investment in Malaysia continues to drop due to some factors that affect the sector. Malaysia had faces economic headwinds due to natural disaster and some political issues that resulted in the plunging value of ringgit. Hence, foreign investors have a lack of confidence and not much interested to invest in real estate market especially when they have to put themselves at high risk. After the implementation of Good and Services Tax (GST) in the first quarter of year 2015, it causes a slowdown in domestic consumption and lower retail sales that makes the prices increased. The study investigated factors such as GDP Growth, the influence of interest rate, inflation rates and population growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)Same topicScarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and BiogeographyFrench-language works237,207