Self-efficacy and outcome : do they correlate in fibromyalgia?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This prospective observational study examined whether baseline self-efficacy can predict health status, post-rehabilitation and whether changes in self-efficacy are associated with changes in health status. Thirty-one subjects with fibromyalgia were recruited consecutively from referrals to rehabilitation programs in Montreal area centers. Assessments, including the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, were done before and after completion of the program, to provide baseline and outcome measures of self-efficacy and health status. Baseline correlations showed a mild-to-moderate association of self-efficacy with physical and mental health status. Baseline self-efficacy for function (FSE) showed a trend towards predicting physical functioning and bodily pain. Baseline self-efficacy for other symptoms (OSE) also showed a trend towards being predictive of bodily pain and mental health. Correlations of the changes showed that FSE and OSE were associated with physical functioning, vitality, social functioning and role-functioning emotional. This research contributes to the understanding of fibromyalgia patients' responses to rehabilitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".