The Status of the Patient and the 1504 Regimento
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the early 16th century, when All Saints Royal Hospital was established, the royal power s political capacity wasgreatly diminished. The Crown exercised jurisdiction over a quarter of the Kingdom s territory, sharing authoritywith high ranking nobles, the military orders, ecclesiastical donees, lay people, and the communities. The total number of annual appointments of literate ministers did not exceed ten; the monarch was advised by two secretaries of the Chamber; the affairs of justice and grace involved half a dozen appellate judges and a dozen judges in the House of Justice; the treasury was in the hands of five superintendents; and security depended on enlistment for the militias and the bodies of orderlies. The six existing counties and the precariousness of the road networks illustrate the fragility of political communication and territorial organization. Regarding assistance, the post of Físico--mor [chief physician] did not yet exist (1521), nor that of Provedor-mor da Saúde [chief health purveyor] (1526), although the Lisbon Misericórdia [house of mercy] (1498) was already operating.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".