MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7034130327

Southeastern biology

2015· article· en· W7034130327 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries, Manuscripts, and Books
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Forest ServiceNational Museum of Natural HistoryU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceKillam TrustsRoyal Swedish Academy of SciencesRoyal Society Te ApārangiUniversity of OxfordBritish Ecological SocietyAmerican Society of Ichthyologists and HerpetologistsUniversity of Tennessee, KnoxvilleFlorida Institute of TechnologyTennessee Valley AuthorityVirginia Academy of ScienceEastern Kentucky UniversityKentucky Academy of ScienceMichigan Department of Natural ResourcesSmithsonian InstitutionTulane UniversityVirginia Commonwealth UniversityBotanical Society of AmericaUniversità degli Studi di FerraraNorthern Kentucky UniversitySouthern Appalachian Botanical SocietyOld Dominion UniversityEmory UniversityAppalachian State UniversityUniversity of ConnecticutNorth Carolina State UniversityState University of New YorkJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of Tennessee at ChattanoogaLouisiana Department of Wildlife and FisheriesOhio State UniversityAmerican Academy of Forensic SciencesUniversity of PennsylvaniaNational Park ServiceEcological Society of AmericaNational Science FoundationOklahoma State UniversityElon UniversityDirectorate for Biological SciencesNational Geographic Society
Keywordsnot available
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

She served in the Peace Corps as a health specialist volunteer in Togo, West Africa, where she primarily worked with integrating traditional healers into the HIV/AIDS prevention efforts.It was in this role

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2930.207

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.008 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution)Same topicLibraries, Manuscripts, and BooksFrench-language works237,207