A Social History of Native Residents of Washington, D.C., 1835 to 1973
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation discusses the long history of Indigenous presence and participation in the history of Washington D.C. Native people have claimed space for their nations inside the U.S. capital city to protect their sovereignty, provide services for their communities, and to reset harmful stereotypical narratives. They used the Indigenous concept of kinship to accomplish these goals. Native Washingtonians have lived in the U.S. capital city since its earliest times and continue to live there today. This research explores the history of Native D.C. through the lives of four individuals, Kangiduta (Sisseton Wahpeton Dakota), Sophie Pitchlynn (Choctaw), Zitkala Sa (Yankton Dakota), and D’Arcy McNickle (Métis). These individuals lived in D.C. during different time periods and through their lives, readers experience the challenges and accomplishments of Native Washingtonians between 1835 and 1973. This research demonstrates the consistent presence of Native peoples, both the local state recognized tribal governments and federally recognized tribal governments—in the U.S. capital city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".