Superovulation and embryo quality with porcine follicle \nstimulation hormone (pFSH) in Katahdin hair sheep \nduring breeding season
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estrus synchronization of 21 ewes was carried out using intravaginal sponges (60 mg of \nmedroxyprogesterone acetate, Sincrogest®-Sanfer, Mexico) for 14 days. 7 ewes were randomly \nassigned to one of the three treatments: T1, 80 mg; T2, 120 mg; T3, 140 mg of porcine follicle stimulating \n(pFSH) (Folltropin-p®-Bioniche, Canada) administered on day 12 after sponge insertion. The dose was \ndivided in decreasing doses; second and third day representing 50 to 75% and 25 to 33% of the first day \ndose, respectively. At the beginning of superovulation treatment, each ewe received 5 mg of dinoprost \ntromethamine (1 ml of Lutalyse® Pfizer, Mexico). An effect of pFSH level was observed on the interval \nfrom sponge removal and the onset of estrus (REI) (P < 0.01), with a difference of 13.5 h between ewes \nfrom treatment 2 and 3. The number of follicles (F), number of collected embryos (CE) and transferable \nembryos (TE) (P < 0.05) was also different among treatments, with highest values observed in T3 (3.0 ± \n0.6 for CE and 2.3 ± 0.5 for TE). Embryo recovery rate was in average 66.5%, (P > 0.05) of CL observed. \nFurther investigation is guaranteed to evaluate the effect of pFSH doses on estrus synchronization for \nselected breeding seasons
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it