MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7034223798

A Systematic Review of Literature on\nDietary Transition- Causes and\nConsequences in the Indigenous\nPopulations of The Arctic

2020· dissertation· en· W7034223798 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircumpolar starIndigenousArcticThe arcticSystematic reviewDemographicsTraditional knowledge
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The traditional diet in the Arctic Indigenous populations have undergone a\nsignificant transition. The Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) has been\nlooking into this dietary transition happening in the circumpolar earth for more than 20 years\nfrom now and explained them through the studies focusing on changes in Arctic biodiversity,\nhuman health, and natural environment. But there has not been any chapter explicitly focusing on\nthe transition of the food, diet, and nutritional status in the populations living in the Arctic.\nIndigenous communities are the majority living in these demographics and their traditional food\nhabits have gone through a drastic change and hence affecting their health and lifestyle. This\nstudy has focused on exploring the changes or transition in traditional food habits, diet, and\nnutrition while identifying the causes and consequences to these changes in the indigenous\ncommunities living in the Arctic regions through a systematic review of literature of the existing\nvalid evidence.\n\nMethods: The study has been conducted through a systematic literature review including 91\nliterature (journals, books, reports, national surveys, articles, and unpublished manuscripts from\nregional health experts and researchers) related to the topics Arctic indigenous food, diet,\nnutrition, dietary transition, and traditional indigenous diet. Additional 5 literature was added to\nformalize the method for the study. The relevant non-English pieces of literature were excluded\nat first. Still, some of them have been included as the regional and native experts from AMAP\nHHAG helped the study team with the English translation. The literature that did not match the\nstudy objectives and keywords were excluded from the study. The references for the study have\nbeen organized using Endnote 9X. For wording, citation and referencing APA 6th format has\nbeen followed.\n\nResults: A pattern of changes has been found in all indigenous and native populations residing\nin the Arctic regions (Greenland, Scandinavia, Arctic Russia, Arctic Alaska, Arctic Canada)\ncaused by rapid globalization, gradual climate change, and inclusion of western diet. Traditional\ndiet was found more popular among the older generations than that was found in the younger\ngenerations in the Arctic indigenous communities. It is found that the dietary changes have increased adverse health effects such as the increased prevalence of T2D, obesity, dental carries\nand other metabolic diseases. On the positive side, these changes found beneficial in terms of\nnutrient intake, as more vegetables have been included recently within the daily dietary\ncomposition. However, the traditional diet is still considered as an integral part of the indigenous\ncultures and traditions by all the Arctic indigenous populations. Rising concern regarding food\ninsecurity also has been found in the North American Arctic territories (Alaska and Canada) and\nArctic Russia which has been reported as one of the causes for the changes in the traditional diet,\nbesides other mentioned causes.\n\nConclusion: A similarity has been observed in dietary change patterns among all the Arctic\nindigenous populations, which has both positive and negative consequences in terms of\npopulations’ health. Similarity has also been noted in terms of causes among the populations.\nGlobalization, climate change, and inclusion of western diet have been found as the common\ncauses for the overall traditional dietary patterns of the indigenous communities went and still\ngoing through the transition. A rising concern in terms of food insecurity has also been found\nmainly in Arctic Canada, Arctic Alaska, and Arctic Russia.\n\nKeywords: Arctic traditional diet, Dietary Transition in the Arctic, Nutrition, Arctic Indigenous\nPopulations, Food Insecurity in Northern or Arctic Canada, Arctic Alaska, North and North-Western\nRussia, Northern Norway, Sweden, Finland, Greenland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.065
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.065
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.006
Bibliometrics0.0200.022
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDuo Research Archive (University of Oslo)→Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology Research→French-language works237,207→