Top-down global methanol budget: the view from IASI, FTIR and in situ measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the large yet uncertain source of methanol, its atmospheric oxidation by hydroxyl radicals (OH) affects the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere (and therefore the lifetime of the climate gas methane) and contributes to the budget of formaldehyde. Here we report a global budget of methanol constrained by multi-platform observations. Our focus is on continental sources, and particularly on biogenic emissions which represent by far the largest component of the global budget. The spaceborne methanol column data newly retrieved from the IASI satellite sensor are used as constraints on biogenic and pyrogenic emissions in the global chemistry-transport model MAGRITTEv1.1 (Müller et al. 2019). The IASI data are based on an improved version of the Artificial Neural Network for IASI (ANNI) retrieval framework, which relies on a hyperspectral range index (HRI) for the quantification of the gas spectral signature and on an artificial feedforward neural network to convert the HRI into a gas total column (Franco et al. 2018). The vertical profile shapes of methanol concentrations used in ANNI rely on a synthesis of aircraft measurements over land and ocean. Direct comparison of FTIR methanol columns with co-located IASI data (at St Petersburg, Jungfraujoch, Toronto, Porto Velho and Reunion Island) shows good agreement (r~0.8) despite a slight underestimation of large columns (>5x1016 molec.cm-2).The MAGRITTE model and its adjoint are used to derive top-down methanol emissions constrained by IASI data over land for several years between 2010 and 2019. The extratropical biogenic emissions are substantially enhanced (+80%) by the inversion, while tropical emissions decrease over rainforests (e.g. Indonesia) and increase in dry ecosystems. The model is also used as intercomparison platform to assess the consistency between the IASI, FTIR, aircraft and surface in situ data. Additional inversion experiments are conducted using adjusted IASI datasets (a) bias-corrected against FTIR columns, and (b) bias-corrected against aircraft data over Northern America from the campaigns SEAC4RS, SENEX, DISCOVER and NOMADSS. The comparison indicates the existence of a probable bias between optical and in situ methanol data, which remains so far unresolved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".