Tiburones zorro y otros condrictios en el Círculo del Estrecho, un recurso marino infravalorado por la Arqueología
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies on fisheries and the fish-salting industry in ancient times have paid little attention to date to the finding of cartilaginous fish (Chondrichthyes), which are very present in archaeozoological records, albeit in small quantities. In this paper we present new evidence coming from archaeological activities in two sites in the “Circle of the Strait”, Luis Milena in San Fernando (2nd century BC) and Alcalde Victori Goñalons from Ceuta (8th-9th centuries AD). With the identification of Thresher sharks (Alopias vulpinus), trying to demonstrate the diachronic attesting of these resources; And a preliminary review of the published bibliography, putting on the table the abundance of sharks, and the scant attention paid to the research to date. We also reflect on the bromatological –nutritional- role that these resources could have, and their fishing, salting and socio-economic importance in Antiquity, opening a new line of research to be developed in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".