The true commercial policy for Greater Britain.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In preparing the following paper I felt that it was hardly- possible to do justice to so vast a subject within the bounds of a single address, but if the paragraphs which represent the chapters I would fain have added serve to attract attention and induce consideration of the matters refered to, I will bg con- tent.Commercial union or North American free trade can hardly be said to be within the sphere of politics in Canada until the United States Congress pronounces upon it.The resolution introduced, since this paper was written, into the Dominion Parliament was therefore, perhaps inopportune, and had the appearance of an attempt to place representatives elected at a time when the subject had not been mooted, in apparent variance with the wishes of the majority of the people.The result was a vote as nearly as possible upon strict party lines.Whether the course adopted will redound to the credit of the Opposition depends greatly upon the action of the Government during the period which may elapse before another election takes place.Should Congress declare in favor of such a measure, that election cannot be delayed very long.If not, matters may drag out for the usual term.When the subject finally does come to an issue let us hope that the object
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".